response〖langcheng〗(4.5 22:45) (17053)
明见因果的人,决不会抵毁大乘.（内空）〖wxj〗(4.6 8:46) (20066)
I afraid that it is not so〖langcheng〗(4.6 18:32) (4.6 18:43) (23325)
您是学者吧？〖lzh〗(4.6 20:47) (4.6 20:58) (26162)
Not really〖langcheng〗(4.7 19:06) (26908)
   |
||||
 |
response |  |
||
 the main theme of the Fa Hua Jing is disparaging the value of early buddhism which is the relatively original ideas of the buddha.
kakamata langcheng 2001.4.5 22:45:20 来自:uk |
||||
 |
(815-40) 显示次数：17053(14499+2554)
|
 |
||
|
||||
|
明见因果的人,决不会抵毁大乘.（内空） | |
||
|
wxj 2001.4.6 8:46:32 来自:福建泉州惠安 |
||||
|
(815-41) 显示次数：20066(17507+2559)
|
|
||
|
||||
|
I afraid that it is not so | |
||
|
The term Mahayana is simply a word which looks down the early buddhism. By the way, I wonder how much you know about the real history of buddhism?
Besides, could you please do me a favour and tell me: in which buddhist text the buddha is said that, while being a hinayan bhikkhu,he had been suffered for numinous aeons in hell for his slandering Mahayana? kakamata
发布于：2001.4.6 18:32:57 修改于：2001.4.6 18:43:10 |
||||
|
(815-42) 显示次数：23325(20600+2725)
|
|
||
|
||||
|
您是学者吧？ | |
||
|
不管你是谁，是研究宗教历史的，还是信徒，我们佛教都欢迎你，
都要教育你，承认你是佛子，哪怕你自己不承认。 如果你认为自己学问多，对佛教的历史了解多。那么我告诉你， 对于佛教来说，你看到的只不过是装饰无价珍宝的盒子。 你想知道大乘是什么意思吗？学者是理解不了的，哈哈 注：我的英语不好，如有误解请原谅
发布于：2001.4.6 20:47:12 修改于：2001.4.6 20:58:08 |
||||
|
(815-44) 显示次数：26162(23513+2649)
|
|
||
|
||||
|
Not really | |
||
|
don't misunderstand please. I am a buddhist but I prefer the original teachings of the buddha. I might be unable to understand the teaching of Mahayana, but I know it is not worthy to spend time on that. what do you think???
kakamata langcheng 2001.4.7 19:06:44 来自:uk |
||||
|
(815-46) 显示次数：26908(24226+2682)
|
|
||
| 妙法莲华 法华论坛 www.fahua.com WiseForum1.0 Since1999.6 |
